History 392 SPR 11

Goodbeer really went into great details about how the youth were being raised in New England Colonies of the 18th Century and how there sexual life was dealt with in this era.  It was fascinating to find out that the church and state were becoming more open to the youths sexual behavior.  Parents were allowing there daughters to go more and socialize with their peers and stay late at night, they even allowed young men into their homes to spend the night and sleep in the same bed with their daughters as long as they practiced bundling.  Well of course, were there is a will there is a way and the bundling did not deter most not to have sexual intercourse. 

The church was always promoting marriage before sex but also wanted to claim this new generation into membership of the church so they were more excepting of their sex behaviors outside of marriage because they believed they were bethroed, and as long as they committed themselves to the church first, would repent their sin to the congregation they would escape any harsh penalties.  However, some of the youths did not end up getting married, some of the young men denied encounters with the women and if the girl got pregnant he would live her with the bastard child (I really don't like this term, but is how it is described in these times).  There were some advantages and disadvantages to the sexual freedom of the youth.  The advantages of having they young men over and letting them have their affairs in the parents home was that the parents knew exactly who the potential husband might be but most importantly if there daughter became pregnant there was no question as to whom the father would be and of course who would be financially responsible for the child. 

As a parent myself, and wanted the best for my children, I can see how this would to the best interest of my daughter.  But unfortunately, if the daughter had sex outside of the home it would harder to prove paternity and she often be abandoned by the young man who would deny any relationship with the girl. She would become vulnerable to parents, church and state punishments for her sin of sex outside of marriage.  I thought it was quite interesting how some of the young men of affluent rich families would try to deny any relationship with the girl and try to abandon her with the the child.  Thank goodness the courts would seek child support and even today its a problem with men trying to escape the consequences of fatherhood. 

Later in Goodbeer, the sexual revolution would detail the many brothels and debauchery that would take place with all social classes and the higher incidence of pregnancy out of wedlock, infidelities of men and women from well to do families and also the spread of venereal diseases.  Again, if you were rich and could afford to lay with prostitutes and have mistresses it was more acceptable socially then if you were of a lower class.  I really felt a sense of sorrow to think that so many married women had to accept their husbands extramarital affairs, could lay with prostitutes, have 4 mistresses, and how the double-standard existed. 

Women were frowned on for having an affair even though her husband would not love her anymore and be absent for the home for so long, but mostly how the courts viewed male extramarital affairs as something as acceptable for a man.  Also, the one that was so demeaning was that fact that women are at fault for the way they look, there bodies enticing men and they are evil temptresses.  Because of women men fall prey to their sexual desires and it there fault for their shortcomings.

Week 2 readings Hisotry 392 SPR 11

I was so perplexed of the injustices and mistreatment that the Puritan Church would impose on couples who were found guilty of adultery, bigotry, or having children out of wedlock.  The church members were so cruel with their punishments of whipping, hangings, execution on these simple folk. It really seem to be by the documents and essays previewed by Peiss that the colonists were trying there best to live according to the laws cast on them by the church.  The women and men would dedicate their life and bodies to the church and even in some way also claim there devotion to Christ by following all the rules and regulations.

Firstly, the women were seen mostly as objects and their sexuality was primarily linked to procreation and property of their husbands.  Even if the husband (the Chameleon Lover, Mr. Byrd) was in love with his wife and according to the Godbeer readings he would often times sleep around, and would satisfy his sexual needs with whomever he wanted.  If he was a member of the church and was found guilty of infidelities it was a simple punishment of 1 year away from his position and of course since he had some money fines would be imposed that would go into the church funds.  But, mostly interesting but not surprising to me was how some upper class white men and even young sons would be less prosecuting by the church and state for their acts of violence against women of color or their servants.  If a young man from a well to do family assaulted and raped a servant it was considered just a sexual whim that he need to fulfill to become a healthy adult man and since he was  heir to the property and had upper class status it was he had every right to do as he pleased.

The documents in Peiss about the English migrant Mr. Hall who was brought to court for cross dressing was very interesting to me because of the violation of privacy and his identity by his neighbors, church and state imposed on him.  They each  had their turn in actually stripping him of his clothing to view his genitals and inspect his body to verify his gender.  Both Godbeer and Peiss recount how this person lived since the age of 12 learned to do needlework's (dressed like a woman), and also fight in the war (dressed like a man). After the war he tried to dress in women clothes and live as a servant in a home with much disapproval to the community.  He was never really charged with anything in court because the Governor was afraid his gender identities might initiate acts of sodomy which was against the church teachings for men and women  It was was unnatural and would not serve the purposes of procreation which was the only licit way of condoning sexual relations.  It was not easy for the courts to charge him with any wrong doing because he dress according to what type of work he would find.  I am sure that there still exist many issues with transvestism today because our society has constructed a perception on how a male or female should dress to fit into society, but am glad that such violation of persons DOES NOT occur in courts today.

1st reading blog - History 392 SPR 11 ( Prof. Morgan)

The readings this week were quite eye-opening to me in respect the treatments and injustices that the Native American Indians endured by the hands of the Spanish soldiers and European Americans.  I often heard or read about how the Indians were mistreated as far as their lands were invaded and they were forced to give up their habitats, but the sexual abuse of the women was despicable and so inexcusable.

One other thing that bothers me is that the American Indians were called, "savages", but actually the colonists and Spanish soldiers were in my opinion savages because they would violate their rights, especially the women by raping them and belittling them.  They would savagely rape the women and kill others from the tribe that got in there way.  Also, they had been well aware that the Indian men did not have access to guns like they did and would take advantage of that and shot them in cold blood.  Who is the savage?

I enjoyed reading about how the mothers were so open in communication with their daughters' and gave them the right to use their bodies as they wished.  It showed that they had no ill wishes towards them and that they respected and trusted their decisions to become a woman.  Sexual encounters within the tribe were conducted with no guilt or shame and they followed attractions from the heart and were more of a spiritual nature.